Home » Latest » Trending Now » HUGE Win For Johnny Depp

HUGE Win For Johnny Depp

2

InfoSearched 97 0 Trending Now

8.2

SaveSavedRemoved 1

Johnny Depp just cleared the biggest legal hurdle standing between him and a courtroom showdown with Amber Heard.

A Virginia judge has thrown out Amber Heard’s bid to get Depp’s $50 million defamation lawsuit tossed before it ever reaches trial. Fairfax County Circuit Court Chief Judge Bruce White denied Heard’s supplemental plea in bar, the legal maneuver her team was counting on to kill the case outright. For Depp, who filed suit in March 2019, it’s the clearest sign yet that his claims are headed to a jury.

• Judge Bruce White denied Amber Heard’s supplemental plea in bar seeking dismissal of Depp’s $50 million defamation suit.
• The lawsuit stems from Heard’s December 2018 Washington Post op-ed, in which she described herself as “a public figure representing domestic abuse.”
• Heard’s lawyers argued Virginia was the wrong forum and that her statements weren’t defamatory — arguments the judge rejected, allowing the case to proceed toward trial.

The Ruling in Fairfax County

Depp sued Heard in Fairfax County because that’s where the Washington Post’s printing presses and servers are located, giving Virginia jurisdiction over the piece even though neither Depp nor Heard lives in the state. Heard’s attorneys tried to argue that was improper, and separately claimed her op-ed never named Depp and didn’t rise to the level of defamation needed to justify a trial. Judge White wasn’t persuaded by either argument, ruling that Depp’s team had presented enough evidence and enough of an actionable claim under Virginia law to let the case move forward.

That’s a significant procedural win, because a plea in bar is exactly the kind of motion designed to end a case before a single witness is ever sworn in. Heard’s team swung and missed, and now the $50 million lawsuit is officially cleared for a full trial rather than an early dismissal.

Analysis of Heard’s Opinion Article

The op-ed at the center of everything ran in the Washington Post in December 2018, timed to Heard’s advocacy work around domestic violence legislation. She never used Depp’s name, but his lawyers argued the piece was written to be understood as being about him, pointing to the timeline of their 2016 divorce and the abuse allegations that came with it.

“a public figure representing domestic abuse”

That single phrase from Heard’s essay is the crux of Depp’s case — his lawyers say it was written and read as a direct reference to their marriage, and that the implication cost him work and reputation. Heard’s side insisted the op-ed was about domestic violence broadly and shouldn’t be read as an accusation against any one person. Judge White’s ruling means a jury, not a judge, will eventually be the one to decide who’s right.

Two Fronts in the Same Fight

Depp isn’t just fighting this battle in Virginia. He’s also pursuing a libel case in the United Kingdom against The Sun, which published a 2018 article calling him a “wife beater” in reference to the same allegations involving Heard. That UK proceeding is running on its own separate track, with its own evidence and its own timeline, but it’s part of the same larger effort by Depp to clear his name in court rather than in the press.

Fans following the saga have plenty to dig through elsewhere on the site, including our Trending Celebrities coverage and pieces like WTF Happened to VAL KILMER? for more on how Hollywood careers get rewritten by headlines.

The Stakes for Both Sides

For Depp, the Virginia case is about far more than money. He’s seeking $50 million in damages, but the real prize is a public, on-the-record finding that Heard’s abuse claims were false. For Heard, avoiding trial was always the safer play — losing the plea in bar means her legal team now has to defend her original statements in front of a jury, under oath, with Depp’s lawyers free to cross-examine her directly.

No trial date had been locked in as of this ruling, but with the dismissal bid dead, both sides are now bracing for discovery, depositions, and eventually a courtroom in Fairfax County where a jury — not a judge on a motion — will decide whose version of the marriage holds up.